> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Comments are welcome.
>
> This is a bad idea. It makes an already-poorly-tested code path
> significantly more fragile, in return for nothing of value.
Are you saying that procsignal.c is the already-poorly-tested one? If
so, why?
As for "value", I have already explained why we need this in the
upthread.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
