On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 03:08:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:10:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> [citation needed]? Exactly what characters are missing, and why would
> >> the Unicode people have chosen to leave them out? It's not like they've
> >> not heard of those encodings, I'm sure.
>
> > Here is an interesting description of some of the gotchas:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1252
>
> Well, it's interesting, but I see no glyphs on that page that lack
> Unicode assignments.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
You are correct. I mis-read the text.
Regards,
Ken
