Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shigeru HANADA
Subject Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw
Date
Msg-id 20101214153135.A5F4.6989961C@metrosystems.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:01:36 +0900
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:25, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > On 12/13/2010 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In that case I guess I'll need to do what Shigeru-san has done, and copy
> > large parts of copy.c.
> 
> I found file_fdw would require the executor state in CopyState and
> the error callback function. I revised the patch to export them.
> Now 5 functions are exported from copy.c:
> 
> - BeginCopyFrom(rel, filename, attnamelist, options) : CopyState
> - EndCopyFrom(cstate) : void
> - NextCopyFrom(cstate, OUT values, OUT nulls, OUT tupleOid) : bool
> - GetCopyExecutorState(cstate) : EState *
> - CopyFromErrorCallback(arg)
> 
> Are they enough, Shigeru-san?  Note that the internal CopyFrom() is
> now implemented only with them, so I think file_fdw is also possible.

In addition to above, ResetCopyFrom() is necessary to support nested
loops which inner node is a ForeignScan.

On the other hand, I think that MarkPos()/RestrPos() wouldn't be
necessary until ForeignScan supports ordered output.  ForeignScan
can't become direct child of MergeJoin because ForeignScan is not an
ordered scan, at least in current SQL/MED implementation.

Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: hstores in pl/python
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw