Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 22/09/10 20:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> > But it CAN'T be a system catalog, because, among other problems, that
> > rules out cascading slaves, which are a feature a lot of people
> > probably want to eventually have.
>
> FWIW it could be a system catalog backed by a flat file. But I'm not in
> favor of that for the other reasons I stated earlier.
I thought we just eliminated flat file backing store for tables to
improve replication behavior --- I don't see returning to that as a win.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
