Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited
Date
Msg-id 201009220331.o8M3Vue12542@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Offhand I think I like Andrew's recommendation of a shortlived branch
> > better.  In essence your idea is using the tip of "master" itself as a
> > shortlived branch, which is maybe a bit too cute.  If you get distracted
> 
> True.

However, keep in mind that creating a branch in every existing backpatch
branch is going to create even more backpatching monkey-work.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited