Re: Git conversion status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Git conversion status
Date
Msg-id 201009201847.o8KIlv319308@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Git conversion status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Git conversion status
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > Since there haven't been any commits in cvs during the day, the test
> > conversoin I created after lunch should be identical to a new one I'd
> > run now, so let's use that one :-)
> 
> This is not even close to matching the tarballs :-(.  Seems to be a
> locale problem: the diffs look like
> 
> 1c1
> < /* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/contrib/citext/citext.sql.in,v 1.3 2008/09/05 18:25:16 tgl Exp $ */
> ---
> > /* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/contrib/citext/citext.sql.in,v 1.3 2008-09-05 18:25:16 tgl Exp $ */
> 
> Please fix and re-run.

As a curiosity, I do prefer the dashed dates. I have had a number of
cases where I have to change dashes to slashes when passing ISO dates as
parameters to CVS.  Shame they improve it just as we are leaving CVS.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Git conversion status