Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun ago 23 14:55:55 -0400 2010:
>
> > OK, I have attached a proposed patch to improve this. I moved the
> > pg_clog mention to a new paragraph and linked it to the reason the
> > default is relatively low.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> I think the new para doesn't make much sense, in context. Why does it
> say "freeze"? How can we expect users to understand how that is
> related to this parameter?
I have removed the freeze mention per Tom's comment and posted an
updated version that removes the 'freeze' wording. Are there other
changes needed?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
