Re: Massively Parallel transactioning? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Benjamin Smith
Subject Re: Massively Parallel transactioning?
Date
Msg-id 201008191119.16320.lists@benjamindsmith.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Massively Parallel transactioning?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Massively Parallel transactioning?
List pgsql-general
On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 04:58:08 pm Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Well if you are just using it for updates to the schema etc... you
> should only need to launch a single connection to each database to make
> those changes.

And that's exactly the problem. On each server, we have at least dozens of
active databases - one for each client. Opening a connection for each database
starts to become problematic.

This problem is now solved with prepared transactions.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Benjamin Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Massively Parallel transactioning?
Next
From: Scott Brunza
Date:
Subject: ip contained within subnet