On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> >> There has been previous talk of allowing WITH (COPY ...) and I am
> >> personally of the opinion that it would be nice to be able to do
> >> WITH (EXPLAIN ...). DDL seems like a poor idea.
> >
> > It may be, but I can see use cases for partitioning...
>
> Like what?
Managing partitions, or creating partitions in some way the partition
syntax doesn't anticipate, whatever it turns out to be.
> >> P.S. Call me a prude, but your choice of shorthand for
> >> insert-update-delete may not be the best.
> >
> > Then I presume you'll be supporting my idea of using the word
> > "span" for temporal data types rather than the current idea whose
> > name appears in academic literature.
>
> Wise guy.
In all seriousness, the temporal stuff is giving us a fantastic
opportunity, as a project, to break our tradition of lousy naming.
"Span" is descriptive, mnemonic, and easy to spell.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
