Re: pg_upgrade test - Mailing list pgsql-testers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade test
Date
Msg-id 201008151836.o7FIa4U23308@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_upgrade test  (Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>)
List pgsql-testers
Mario Splivalo wrote:
> [TEST REPORT]
> [Release]: 9.0Beta4
> [Test Type]: Feature test
> [Test]: pg_upgrade
> [Platform]: Ubuntu 10.04 64bit
> [Parameters]: Default
> [Failure]: No
> [Results]: pg_upgrade successful
>
>
> I run the test on the 6 GB cluster consisting of 6 databases.
> The 'old style' test (pg_dumpall / pg_restore) took around 26 minutes.
> Doing `pg_dump -Fc f` for each database, then recreating databases and
> users on new (9.0b4) cluster, and then pg_restoring databases took 15
> minutes. (Too bad one can't pg_dumpall -Fc).
>
> Using pg_upgrade the migration took 5 minutes, including 'vacuumdb -aZ'.
> Great tool!

Great, thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-testers by date:

Previous
From: Mario Splivalo
Date:
Subject: pg_upgrade test
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4