On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:53:54AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 09:44 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:27:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > > > Here's an updated patch, with the invalidation changes merged
> > > > in and hopefully-suitable adjustments elsewhere.
> > >
> > > I haven't tested this patch, but I read through it (and have I
> > > mentioned how unbelievably illegible -u format patches are?).
> >
> > I have every confidence that you, of all people, can arrange to
> > use 'filterdiff --format=context' on attached patches
> > automatically, saving you some time and us some boredom :)
>
> I was under the impression that the project guideline was that we
> only accepted context diffs?
Since they're trivially producible from unified diffs, this is a
pretty silly reason to bounce--or even comment on--patches. It's less
a guideline than a personal preference, namely Tom's.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
