Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Date
Msg-id 20100810111855.GD29153@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:13:22PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> pg_dump allows us to select multiple target tables by using
> multiple -t switches, but pg_restore does not. So, when
> restoring multiple tables, we have to run pg_restore more
> than once as follows. This is a pain to me.
> 
>     $ pg_restore -t tbl1 db.dump
>     $ pg_restore -t tbl2 db.dump
> 
> Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
> switches as well as pg_dump?
> 
>     $ pg_restore -t tbl1 -t tbl2 db.dump
> 
> Regards,

Yes. :)

What other functionality in pg_dump does pg_restore not duplicate?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boxuan Zhai
Date:
Subject: MERGE command for inheritance
Next
From: "Erik Rijkers"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?