On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 05:34:57PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> Tom: Because that code is much more complex and prone to errors
> especially when you start getting into multiplication and other
> operations and it's also much slower than the code which allows
> overflow to happen and then checks that the result makes sense.
> I'm not entirely sure I agree. At least I haven't actually gone
> through all the arithmetic operations and I'm not sure how much more
> complex they get. If they were all at that level of complexity I think
> I would say we should go ahead and bite the performance bullet and do
> it the ultra-safe way.
FWIW, here's a site with some gcc magic which will allow you to detect
overflows during addition. Ofcourse, the fact that it's gcc specific
makes it a lot less useful.
http://www.fefe.de/intof.html
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism,
> when hate for people other than your own comes first.
> - Charles de Gaulle
