Re: Question about Idle in TX - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Kerr
Subject Re: Question about Idle in TX
Date
Msg-id 20100803195257.GC53503@mr-paradox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question about Idle in TX  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Question about Idle in TX
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:49:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
- David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net> writes:
- > for example: If a java program connects to the DB and does "begin;"
- > and then internally does a "sleep 6 days"
-
- > Does that cauz any issues other than eating a connection to the database?
-
- In recent versions of PG, no.  Before about 8.3 it was a Really Bad Idea,
- because the open transaction would prevent VACUUM from reclaiming storage.
-
- It's *still* a Really Bad Idea to begin a transaction, do something,
- and then sleep 6 days.  But "BEGIN" without any following commands
- has been fixed to be harmless, mainly because there are so many
- badly designed clients that do exactly that ...
-
-             regards, tom lane
-

ah ok, I think i'm in that group. We're using Talend and i think it might be
doing that, and it might be a bit of an effort to stop that from happening.

We're on 8.3.9, so hopefully it's fairly safe then?

Thanks

Dave

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: George Silva
Date:
Subject: Re: Finding the primary key of tables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about Idle in TX