Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Date
Msg-id 201007100001.o6A01to03428@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams  (Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>)
Responses Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams  (Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>)
List pgsql-docs
Rafael Martinez wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/03/2010 01:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> >
> > Also, I think we need to review these images carefully before adding
> > any of them into our docs.
>
> I agree with this. I didn't want to use a lot time with the diagrams
> until everything is decided and we agree to have diagrams in the
> documentation.
>
> They are a proof of concept, different diagram types for different parts
> of the documentation. They all need to be reviewed if they are going to
> be used.
>
> If we go for having diagrams, we should:
>
> - - Create a TODO list with the diagrams we would like to have and where.
> - - Define a procedure and rules to send diagrams patches: how to send,
> review, give feedback, back to send and final commit.
> - - Define some guidelines about how to create a diagram, colors to use,
> key information, etc.

Where are we on this?  Application?  dia? xfig?  Number of colors?  Once
we decide these items, we can start adding diagrams.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + None of us is going to be here forever. +

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: "Erik Rijkers"
Date:
Subject: release-9.0.sgml changes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: release-9.0.sgml changes