On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:42:49PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think the behavior is correct (what else would we do? we must be
> able to replace the subsequent WAL records that use the new
> tablespace) but I agree that the hint is a little misleading.
> Ideally, it seems like we'd like to issue that hint if we're planning
> to restart, but not otherwise. You get that same message, for
> example, if the DBA performs an immediate shutdown.
A bit of a comment from the sidelines: there's no particular reason why
the tablespaces on the master would need to match the tablespaces on
the slave. For a first cut it would seem to me that you should just be
able to ignore the tablespace commands on the slave. Not sure whether
that's easy or not though.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism,
> when hate for people other than your own comes first.
> - Charles de Gaulle
