Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date
Msg-id 201005281639.o4SGdlC28029@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Since former SQL Server / Sybase apps are the most likely to use named 
> parameter notation in PostgreSQL, having a syntax which could be ported 
> using only "sed" would be nice.
> 
> Relevant to the whole discussion, though ... is the conflicting SQL 
> standard syntax something we're every likely to implement?

Not sure, but I assume people could be using the AS syntax in other
databases (for the inheritance usage) and then trying to use it in our
database.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: How to pass around collation information
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature