Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL
Date
Msg-id 20100526163251.GB21875@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL  (Eliot Gable <egable+pgsql-performance@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL
List pgsql-performance
* Eliot Gable (egable+pgsql-performance@gmail.com) wrote:
> Thanks for the quick follow-up. So, you are saying that if I can do SPI in
> _PG_init, then I could prepare all my queries there and they would be
> prepared once for the entire function when it is loaded? That would
> certainly achieve what I want. Does anybody know whether I can do SPI in
> _PG_init?

Unless you're using EXECUTE in your pl/pgsql, the queries in your
pl/pgsql function are already getting prepared on the first call of the
function for a given backend connection..  If you're using EXECUTE in
pl/gpsql then your problem might be planning time.  Moving that to C
isn't going to change things as much as you might hope if you still have
to plan the query every time you call it..

> The function gets called a lot, but not in the same transaction. It is only
> called once per transaction.

That's not really relevant..  Is it called alot from the same
backend/database connection?  If so, and if you're using regular SELECT
statements and the like (not EXECUTE), then they're getting prepared the
first time they're used and that is kept across transactions.

    Thanks,

        Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David Jarvis
Date:
Subject: Re: Random Page Cost and Planner
Next
From: Eliot Gable
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Function Language Performance: C vs PL/PGSQL