Re: Specification for Trusted PLs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Date
Msg-id 20100521175818.GB24638@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:45:45PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * David Fetter (david@fetter.org) wrote:
> > That is *precisely* the business we need to be in, at least for the
> > languages we ship, and it would behoove us to test languages we don't
> > ship so we can warn people when they don't pass.
> 
> k, let's start with something simpler first tho- I'm sure we can pull in
> the glibc regression tests and run them too.  You know, just in case
> there's a bug there, somewhere.

That's pretty pure straw man argument.  I expect much higher quality
trolling.  D-.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?