Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 201005090142.16933.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
On Sunday 09 May 2010 01:34:18 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think everyone agrees the current code is unusable, per Heikki's
> comment about a WAL file arriving after a period of no WAL activity, and
> look how long it took our group to even understand why that fails so
> badly.
To be honest its not *that* hard to simply make sure generating wal regularly 
to combat that. While it surely aint a nice workaround its not much of a 
problem either.

Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful