Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If you aren't archiving then there's no guarantee that you'll still have
> >> a continuous WAL series starting from the start of the backup.
>
> > I wasn't really thinking of this use case, but you could set
> > wal_keep_segments "high enough".
>
> Ah. Okay, that seems like a workable approach, at least for people with
> reasonably predictable WAL loads. We could certainly improve on it
> later to make it more bulletproof, but it's usable now --- if we relax
> the error checks.
>
> (wal_keep_segments can be changed without restarting, right?)
Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
