Re: Int64GetDatum - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Int64GetDatum
Date
Msg-id 201004200303.o3K33hw02727@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Int64GetDatum  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Int64GetDatum  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> writes:
> > I don't know if the build trees can be structured so the include
> > directories can be differentiated the same as the bin and lib...
>
> The RPM distributions are able to deal with this without actually
> differentiating: if you install both 32- and 64-bit RPMs then the
> overlapping files are the same for both, with pg_config.h being
> a stub that does this:
>
> #if defined(__x86_64__)
> #include "pg_config_x86_64.h"
> #elif defined(__i386__)
> #include "pg_config_i386.h"
> ... etc ...
>
> I don't know if Solaris' package management offers the same ability, but
> if it does, then it could be handled like that.

Ah, good idea.  Is pg_config.h the only file that varies from 32 to
64-bit?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Int64GetDatum
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: Int64GetDatum