In response to Raymond O'Donnell :
> On a related note, what happens when you do something like this? -
>
> select count(*) ....
>
> Does any data actually get read?
No, it check's only the visibility for each record -> seq-scan.
>
> Is there any difference internally to saying "count(1)" instead?
No, it's the same execution plan.
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431 2EB0 389D 1DC2 3172 0C99
