Re: ECPG pointer vs array - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: ECPG pointer vs array
Date
Msg-id 20100331111424.GB19061@feivel.credativ.lan
Whole thread Raw
In response to ECPG pointer vs array  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:37:13AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> It would be good if libecpg to support e.g. "char **strings" instead of
> "char *strings[]" for preallocated strings and the array of those.
> ...

I'm open to improvements. The way ecpg accesses variables hasn't been changed
for ages, just new types got added. 

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes@jabber.org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with variable cursorname in ecpg
Next
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with variable cursorname in ecpg