Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Sure, I can easily do that, but I am not sure how to generate a typedef
> > list for that release, except to use the old typedef collection method
> > for that file. Is that OK?
>
> One of the things I noticed while patching was that the 8.3 typedef list
> was missing xmlChar and a few other typedefs that are used a lot in that
> file :-(. So please don't use the same method you used in 8.3.
Yes, I don't have libxml installed on this machine so it didn't pick up
those typedefs.
> I think it would be close enough to use the current (just added to CVS)
> typedef list. Or use the one you used for 8.4 if you have it handy.
> There is not a lot of difference between the 8.3 and current code in
> that file, so either of those are probably going to give you the same
> results.
Done. Sorry for the delay.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do