Re: possible bug not in open items - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: possible bug not in open items
Date
Msg-id 201002260415.o1Q4Fso26904@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: possible bug not in open items  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: possible bug not in open items
List pgsql-bugs
Was this ever addressed?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 21:45 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-03/msg00062.php
> > >
> > > It may or may not be a real bug, but I didn't receive any response. If
> > > you think it might be a bug, can you please add it to the open items?
> >
> > Hmm, odd I don't have it either;  can you repost it?
>
> The docs say:
>
> "SIGINT -- The server disallows new connections and sends all existing
> server processes SIGTERM, which will cause them to abort their current
> transactions and exit promptly."
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/server-shutdown.html
>
> If you have an open COPY and no data is moving, it simply won't
> terminate it. You can terminate it with ctrl-C from psql, but not a
> SIGINT to the postmaster or a SIGINT or SIGTERM to the backend.
>
> Regards,
>     Jeff Davis

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
  PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #4769: xmlconcat produces invalid xml values -> data corruption
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?