Uh, I don't see this patch as applied. Was it not necessary?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It looks like this is enough to reproduce the cache lookup failure:
>
> The "cache loopup failure" part could be fixed by the attached patch.
> It forbids explaining if the transaction is in error state.
>
> I cannot reproduce "unexpected refassgnexpr" and "unexpected FieldStore"
> errors yet. We might need another fix for them.
>
> Regards,
> ---
> ITAGAKI Takahiro
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.comPG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard
drive,Christ can be your backup. +