Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Nobody suggested dismissing it. The point was that it hasn't been
> >> tested adequately to justify applying it now.
>
> > not sure what testing people want to get done though (there are a fair
> > amount of results and profiles in the thread)?
>
> Robert was complaining that the worst case hadn't been characterized
> adequately, which I agree with. We know it helps a lot on certain
> cases, but what's the downside?
Added to TODO list so we don't forget about it:
Considering improving performance of computing CHAR() value lengths
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.comPG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard
drive,Christ can be your backup. +
