What happened to this patch? I don't see any objections, but it was not
applied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Cox wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > Jim Cox escribi?:
> >
> >> Attached s/b a patch for the 8.5 TODO "Add comments to output indicating version
> >> of pg_dump and of the database server" (pg_dump/pg_restore section, 9.2).
> >
> > Hmm, what happens if you do a pg_dump -Fc? ?Is this info saved anywhere
> > in the dump? ?Surely if thi is useful in the text dump, it is useful in
> > the binary format dumps too.
>
> (forgot to reply all)
>
> pg_restore's "-l, --list print summarized TOC of the archive" option
> does display the information in custom format dumps, e.g.:
>
> prompt$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_restore -l < /tmp/mytest.dump
> ;
> ; Archive created at Tue Sep 29 13:48:37 2009
> ; dbname: mytest
> ; TOC Entries: 9
> ; Compression: -1
> ; Dump Version: 1.11-0
> ; Format: CUSTOM
> ; Integer: 4 bytes
> ; Offset: 8 bytes
> ; Dumped from database version: 8.4.0
> ; Dumped by pg_dump version: 8.4.0
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.comPG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard
drive,Christ can be your backup. +
