On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:42:15AM +0000, Richard Huxton wrote:
> On 15/02/10 10:32, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:31:14AM +0000, Richard Huxton wrote:
> >>
> >>Is there any value in having a two-stage interface?
> >>
> >> $seq_fn = get_call('nextval(regclass)');
> >> $foo1 = $seq_fn->($seq1);
> >> $foo2 = $seq_fn->($seq2);
> >
> >I don't think there's significant performance value in that.
> >
> >Perhaps it could be useful to be able to pre-curry a call and
> >then pass that code ref around, but you can do that trivially
> >already:
> >
> > $nextval_fn = sub { call('nextval(regclass)', @_) };
> > $val = $nextval_fn->($seq1);
> >or
> > $nextfoo_fn = sub { call('nextval(regclass)', 'foo_seqn') };
> > $val = $nextfoo_fn->();
>
> Fair enough. Just wondered whether it was worth putting that on your
> side of the interface. I'm forced to concede you probably have more
> experience in database-related APIs than me :-)
I've actually very little experience with PostgreSQL! I'm happy to argue
each case on its merits and am certainly open to education and persuasion.
At the moment I don't see enough gain to warrant an additional API.
I am adding the some examples to the docs though. So thanks for that!
Tim.
