Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> > The documentation has definitely improved from the last time Robert
> > looked at it, but I fear it still needs some more work. I'm willing to
> > do that work, but I need something concrete.
>
> It seems to me documentation is required to get into the source tree
> before beta, and as we see with some other patches it's definitely the
> case even with our newer procedures that some code gets in without its
> documentation properly finished. I guess this amounts to the commiter
> willing to fill up the docs later on.
Eh? Previously we allowed code to go in with documentation to be
written after feature freeze. Is this no longer acceptable?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
