Re: [SPAM]Mammoth in Core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Takahiro Itagaki
Subject Re: [SPAM]Mammoth in Core?
Date
Msg-id 20100118181311.9B47.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Mammoth in Core?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Mammoth in Core?  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> My question is, do we have any interest in working on getting this into
> core?

We had a discussion how replication projects work together with the core
in the developer meeting on PGCon 2009 Japan.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGCon2009JapanClusterDeveloperMeeting

The conclusion is splitting existing projects into some 'modules',
and getting the modules one by one into core. Voted features are here:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ClusterFeatures

Mammoth Replicator seems to modify the core heavily, no?  I hope you
would split the mammoth patch into several independent features,
and submit them separately. It is much better if some of them can
be shared by other replication projects.

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: New XLOG record indicating WAL-skipping
Next
From: Leonardo F
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values