Konrad Garus escribió:
> 2010/1/8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> > So, no wraparound problem ... odder and odder. Could we see the whole
> > -i -f printout for that block? You trimmed some of it before,
> > particularly the block header.
>
> Attached.
>
> Since data on disk looks correct, is it possible to diagnose it on a
> higher level? Could the damage be done by vacuum?
I'm a bit surprised by the block numbers in the block header vs. t_self ...
I would have guessed that they come from a different segment (and
the numbers seem to match, as 603713 % 131072 = 79425), but Konrad
doesn't seem to be using the foo.4 file.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
