On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:32:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think checking SIZEOF_LONG would be preferred, since that's what
> we use elsewhere. Although actually I wonder why this code exists
> at all --- wouldn't it be easier to make these depend on "int64"?
It does use int64. However, ecpg uses HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT64 to decide whether
it's datatype ECPGt_long_long exists. I changed the patch to use the same
define as usual.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
