On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 03:31:58PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
> The JDBC driver does want "cancel if active" behavior. The JDBC API
> specifies Statement.cancel() where Statement is running one particular
> backend query. So it really does want to cancel just that one query.
> Already this is tough because of the asynchronous nature of the cancel
> protocol and the inability to say exactly what should be cancelled.
I've looked in the JDBC documentation but I don't quickly see how they
expect this to work with transactions. What is being proposed seems to
me to be:
If statement active: put transaction in aborted state
If no statement active: do nothing
However, I see that the documentation wants to be able to abort a
*specific* statement, which is not being proposed here. Can that be
implemented on top of the current proposal?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
