Re: Why grantor is owner in this case? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Why grantor is owner in this case?
Date
Msg-id 20091228111017.GA4697@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why grantor is owner in this case?  ("donniehan" <donniehan@126.com>)
Responses Re: Why grantor is owner in this case?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
donniehan wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> I'm sorry to bother you. i really care about this behavior, but i couldn't find the discussions you mentioned in
pgsql-hackersarchives. 
> Would you please tell me more about the discussions(about date? the related issue?), so that i can search it and find
itmore easily?  

Maybe he's referring to this discussion:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1176775180.4152.97.camel%40dogma.v10.wvs

Note that on archives.pg.org it is truncated and continues here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20070503225044.GK4218@alvh.no-ip.org

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: Java Postgres drivers.
Next
From: fernando@lozano.eti.br
Date:
Subject: Re: Java Postgres drivers.