Re: Re: [HACKERS] About "Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when theunderlying tables change" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From suzhiyang
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] About "Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when theunderlying tables change"
Date
Msg-id 200912191125176878598@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to About "Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when the underlying tables change"  ("suzhiyang" <suzhiyang@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Yeah, when a column of the underlying table renamed, this re-executing must be failed...
 
 
2009-12-19

suzhiyang

发件人: Robert Haas
发送时间: 2009-12-19  11:17:44
收件人: suzhiyang
抄送: pgsql-hackers
主题: Re: [HACKERS] About "Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when theunderlying tables change"
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:58 PM, suzhiyang <suzhiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm doing the Todo List's "Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when the underlying
> tables change ". I've a very simple idea that I save the "create view"
> query_string in systable. When I found that I select from a view, I drop the
> view and recreate the view by execute the source query_string. Then go on
> execute this "select from a view" and will get the right answer. My problem
> is that how could I get the orginal query which user typed to postgres?
> Er, maybe drop and recreate the view is an ugly idea...Is there any better
> methods to do recompilation?
I am not sure what this TODO item is supposed to refer to, but saving
the query string and re-executing it is clearly not acceptable.   What
if a column or table or function referenced in the query has been
renamed since the view/rule was created?
...Robert

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: About "Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when the underlying tables change"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: About "Allow VIEW/RULE recompilation when the underlying tables change"