Re: Range types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Range types
Date
Msg-id 20091216211716.GC17751@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Range types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Range types
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 03:57:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> > I still have not seen an answer to the problem of changing the
> > representation of a continuous range. If you have the continuous range
> > [5, 10], you're pretty much stuck with that representation, even if the
> > application is expecting things in the form [ ).
>
> That is not our problem.  It's the application's problem if it can't
> handle the concept.  You might as well be complaining that type numeric
> is broken because it can represent values that will fail to fit into
> float8 when some application tries to force them into that form.

However, it does seem reasonable to allow people to restrict, either by
typmod or a check constraint the kinds of values that can be stored in
a particular column. Then an application can decide which way they want
their intervals to work and have the database enforce it.

(Intermediate values may become a different kind, just as long as the
result being stored it the right kind.)

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Range types
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Update on true serializable techniques in MVCC