Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> > I am not replying to many of these emails so I don't appear to be
> > brow-beating (forcing) the community into accepting this features. I
> > might be brow-beating the community, but I don't want to _appear_ to be
> > brow-beating. ;-)
>
> My apologies if I come across this way- I don't intend to... But I'm
You are fine. I was just saying that at a time I was one of the few
loud voices on this, and if this is going to happen, it will be because
we have a team that wants to do this, not because I am being loud. I
see the team forming nicely.
> also very enthusiastic about this. Also, it's become a much more
> personal issue for me due to this:
>
> http://csrc.nist.gov/news_events/documents/omb/draft-omb-fy2010-security-metrics.pdf
>
> OMB is now looking to include label-based security in their metrics.
> This directly impacts some of the PG-based systems I run.
Ah, very interesting, and good.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
