Re: operator exclusion constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tomas@tuxteam.de
Subject Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date
Msg-id 20091204055051.GD20293@tomas
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: operator exclusion constraints  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:38:06PM -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:

[...]

> "Whatever constraints"? "Operator Whatevers"? "WhatEVER"s? I like it.

drigting serioulsy off-topic: there's precedent for that in the most
venerable piece of free software; TeX has a "whatsit node" (basically an
extension mechanism).

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLGKM7Bcgs9XrR2kYRAuHFAJ0ZZYzlXHJEgwEbsraAlKVI58yLAgCfU4Cz
n+0vobY0HxROigSHUGog7QI=
=MWH+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Installing PL/pgSQL by default