Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:31 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Well, right now we ask for docs, but if they are not supplied, I think
> > we just write them ourselves. Is a different enforcement method being
> > suggested here?
>
> And we never bump late patches, nor reject them if sent in missing
> format etc.
>
> We enforce all manner of rules. You tell me this is your main function
> on the project even. Is there now no enforcement of any rule, just
> because I propose a new one?
Enforcing civil behavior in the group, in a private way, is different
from having a public policy that requires patch review.
Again, I am not against this change --- I am just pointing out it is new
territory for us.
> Address the main question: how will we get more review time? There are
> many other possible proposals, so please lets hear them. (And how would
> they be enforced?)
Not sure, but I would like to point out the bottleneck is not currently
the reviewers but the ability to give final approval and commit it. And
again, the commit process is very fast --- it is that final approval
that is hard.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
