Re: next CommitFest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: next CommitFest
Date
Msg-id 20091112183818.GF4780@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: next CommitFest  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Albert Cervera i Areny
> <albert@nan-tic.com> wrote:
> > A Dijous, 12 de novembre de 2009, Euler Taveira de Oliveira va escriure:
> >> Simon Riggs escreveu:
> >> > So, I
> >> > propose that we simply ignore patches from developers until they have
> >> > done sufficient review to be allowed to develop again.
> >>
> >> Is it really impolite for a first-contributor, no?
> >
> > I don't think so, as long as it's properly explained.
> 
> Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time
> contributors, or even second-time contributors.  But by about patch #3
> I think everyone should be pitching in.

+1.  It's OK to not review anything if you're just doing a one-off.  If
you submit a bunch of patches you start becoming part of the community.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: next CommitFest
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in?