On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:23:16AM -0800, Richard Broersma wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:34 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
>
> > You might be, but that's approximately what happened. Common editors
> > for this task are Emacs and Vim, each of which has varying levels of
> > support for SGML :)
>
> That is amazing. The layout and organization of the PostgreSQL manual
> (to me) is superior to most other reference documents that I view.
I suspect it's from steely discipline, attention to quality, and the
toolkits themselves.
> Was there some sort of specification for the create of these documents
> or was it simply the implementation of good practices? I notice for
> example all reference pages have a consistent layout.
Well, there's the whole Docbook thing, which was pretty well thought
out. Apart from that, I don't know. Peter?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
