Re: Incremental Backups in postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alan Hodgson
Subject Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
Date
Msg-id 200911101356.17600@hal.medialogik.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incremental Backups in postgres  (akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Incremental Backups in postgres  (silly8888 <silly8888@gmail.com>)
Re: Incremental Backups in postgres  (akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tuesday 10 November 2009, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote:
> So Is it always good to have the backup using PG_dump instead of PITR or
> a combination of both
>

I like to do both. Ongoing PITR, daily base backups (by updating an rsync
copy), and weekly pg_dumps that in turn go to tape.

PITR gives a very recent restore point in the event of server loss. As
previously mentioned, the full (custom) backups let you restore individual
tables. They're also a lot smaller than base backups + WAL logs.

--
"No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. We tried but that
damn monkey was just too fast."

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: akp geek
Date:
Subject: Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Editor for sgml files