decibel escribió:
> >If you want it to be seemless and fully optimal, you would
> >introduce a new int256 type (or whatever the name of the type you
> >are trying to represent). Adding new types to PostgreSQL is not
> >that hard. This would allow queries (=, <>, <, >) as well.
>
> If you want an example of that, we had Command Prompt create a full
> set of hash datatypes (SHA*, and I think md5). That stuff should be
> on pgFoundry; if it's not drop me a note at jnasby@cashnetusa.com
> and I'll get it added.
It's at project "shatypes".
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
