On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:26:55 +0530
Gaini Rajeshwar <raja.rajeshwar2006@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ivan,
> If i create a tsvector as you mentioned with concatenation
> operator, my search query will search in any of these fields which
> are concatenated in my tsvector.
> For example, if i create tsvector like this,
> UPDATE document_table SET search_col =
> setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(title,'')), 'A') ||
> setweight(to_tsvector(coalesce(summary,'')), 'B'));
>
> and do a query like this
> select title, ts_rank(search_col, to_tsquery('this is my text
> search') AS rank
> FROM search_col @@ to_tsvector('this & is & my & text & search')
> ORDER BY rank DESC
> the above query will search in title and summary and will give me
> the results. But i dont want in that way.When a user wants to
> search in title, it should just search in title but the results
> should be ranked based on * title* and *summary* field.
Search *just* in title specifying the weight in the input query and
rank on title and summary.
/*
-- somewhere else in your code...
search_col := setweight(cfg, title, 'A', '&');
search_col := search_col && setweight(cfg, summary, 'B', '&');
*/
select rank(search_col, to_tsquery(inputtitle)) as rank
-- rank on both if search_col just contains title and summary
...
where search_col @@ setweight(cfg, inputtitle, 'A', '&')
-- return just matching title
order by ts_rank(...)
is it what you need?
This is just one of the possible way to rank something...
otherwise: really understand how rank is computed, keep
columns/ts_vector separated, compute rank for each column and pass
the result to some magic function that will compute a "cumulative"
ranking...
Or you could write your own ts_rank... but I tend to trust Oleg and
common practice with pg rather than inventing my own ranking
function.
Right now ts_rank* are black boxes for me. I envisioned I may enjoy
some finer tuning on ranking... but currently they really do a good
job.
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
