Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Date
Msg-id 20091005005456.GA4977@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal
List pgsql-hackers
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Oct 4, 2009, at 1:57 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> 
> >It's less about like or dislike and more about facing up to the
> >reality that we've got a major legacy foot-gun left over from the
> >experimentation of the Berkeley days.
> 
> I think you're going to need to be a bit more concrete than that. In
> what way is it a foot-gun? What examples can you provide? What,
> exactly, are the issues?

While I don't agree with David Fetter's premise, I think rehashing how
we handle VIEWs would be a good step towards updatable views.  Right
now, the implementation of that is stalled precisely because of the rule
system.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Making hash indexes worthwhile
Next
From: Dan Colish
Date:
Subject: Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal