On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:48:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Marko Tiikkaja
> <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you at least take a stab at it? We can fix your grammar, but
> >> guessing what's going on without documentation is hard.
> >
> > With some help from David Fetter, I took another try at it. I
> > hope someone finds this helpful. I'm happy to answer any
> > questions.
>
> Thanks. I read through this patch some more tonight and I guess I
> am a bit confused about what it accomplishes. AIUI, the point here
> is to lay the groundwork for a future patch to allow writeable CTEs,
> and I guess I'm not understanding how it's going to do that.
There's another branch in the repository
<http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=writeable_cte.git> called
actually_write which has the beginnings of an implementation based on
this. If you'd like, I can send along either the patch vs.
writeable_cte, or a patch against the main branch.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
