Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From tomas@tuxteam.de
Subject Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings
Date
Msg-id 20090925055514.GA19115@tomas
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:42:32PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 22:46 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:

[...]

> Good idea.  This could also check for other invalid things like
> byte-order marks in UTF-8.

But watch out. Microsoft apps do like to insert a BOM at the beginning
of the text. Not that I think it's a good idea, but the Unicode folks
seem to think its OK [1] :-(
 <http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom5>

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKvFtCBcgs9XrR2kYRAsHXAJ9lpaqZ2IFKGwZd+H3Ej6H+m44vpgCeLe7n
vc+ciE1N5AqOre3DmvwKaNI=
=UTBQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql function is so slow
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] libpq port number handling