Re: autovacuum_max_workers docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Tolley
Subject Re: autovacuum_max_workers docs
Date
Msg-id 20090914001156.GJ4687@eddie
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum_max_workers docs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:54:21PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2009-09-11 at 07:39 -0600, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> While your discovery is accurate and the change makes it consistent with
> other similar parameters, note that the previous wording is also
> completely correct.  This while way of phrasing things is suboptimal.
>
> I've committed it anyway for now.

Although I understand we also need a way to demonstrate which options can be
set interactively, and which can't, I'd love to see "changing this option
requires a restart" or "... a reload", if only because I'm always interpreting
the docs wrong in that respect. That said, if I ever come up with woeding I'm
especially proud of, I'll submit a less-trivial patch.

--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rough draft: easier translation of psql help
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does LOG have higher priority than ERROR and WARNING?